The Gods Among Us
by johnbechtel on February 7, 2010
in Economics, Individual Rights, Property Rights, Uncategorized, Wealth, money
In the beginning there was Money. Well, not exactly. There was barter. There was a high degree of vertical integration, which is a fancy way of saying if you wanted something back then, it was pretty much up to you to grow it or make it yourself. What trade existed was largely between members of the tribe or village or group. If some guy made a pretty cool hunting knife, and his wife was nagging him for a deer to butcher and eat, a trade of the knife for the deer (or parts of it) might take place. Trading was simple, uncomplicated, and very very slow. Life was brutal and short. At the end of the day, when you had run out of you, you had also run out of future. You aged quickly and died young. When groups of nomads found a place to their liking, they sometimes stayed, settled in, and became agrarian. Society became more complex, and slightly greater specialization of labor became possible. One family could grow things from the soil; another could domesticate animals as a source of meat. There was still no Money.
Trading in this primitive context was still taking place among the so-called Indians on this North American continent when the first Europeans arrived. The native Americans were fascinated with some of the baubles brought over by the Europeans and willingly traded furs for them. Eventually some commodities became so commonplace and essential to daily life in primitive societies that they took on new importance as a means of facilitating trade. Salt, because it was needed by everyone for daily purposes, came to assume more importance as a form of “money” than it formerly had as just salt. Since everyone had salt, and used salt, goods and services were traded using salt as the store of value and medium of exchange between trading partners. The same was true of other things of universal value, including furs. Because of their prized ornamental value and scarcity, gold and silver became universally accepted as Money.
The term store of value is very important. Without some universally accepted warehouse of value that had been produced, all exchange was limited to what could be immediately produced and immediately consumed. No long term planning was possible, and without long term planning, the Industrial Revolution with its complex machines and processes was impossible. Modern society was impossible. The invention of Money was a prerequisite to all the amenities of life as we know it. Without the invention of Money, we would all still be primitives. In spite of Rousseau’s idealization of the Noble Savage, the Garden of Eden it was not. Man was the victim of ignorance, superstition, disease, and unmitigated natural disaster the likes of which are only occasionally experienced today in the poorest parts of the world.
In primitive society, wealth was limited to whatever a person could produce in a day, or a month, or a year of his own individual effort. All other wealth was acquired by confiscating the values produced by others at the point of a spear, or in time, at the end of a gun. All great monuments of history were made possible by the confiscation, not only of others wealth, including their grain, their herds, their tools, but also the confiscation of the people themselves, physically. People became property, to be used and exploited by their conquerors. When Rome was starving because of crop failure, their solution was to conquer Egypt with their legions, make that part of North Africa a vassal state and require them to ship their grain to Rome at prices Rome dictated. You might say that Rome “nationalized” Egypt; Cleopatra, in name at least, still “owned” the means of production, but the prices were dictated by Rome, her Master. For a while, she was able to continue her pretense of being in charge of her country, of being Queen. Then one day Caesar extended an invitation she could not refuse: to come to Rome to visit, as his “guest”. The dress code for the event was a little intimidating–naked, in shackles, to be paraded as the spoils of war through the crowds of Roman rabble and oglers, the nobility and the great unwashed. Cleopatra committed suicide.
An Open Letter to Robert Kiyosaki
by johnbechtel on December 23, 2009
in Altruism, Business Opportunity, Capitalism, Economics, Financial Help, Greenville Cashflow Club, Philosophy, Politics, Power of Belief, Rugged individualism, Self Empowerment, Wealth, money
In case you don’t know, Robert Kiyosaki is the author of the Rich Dad series of books on financial literacy, and he and his beautiful wife Kim are the creators of the board game called Cash Flow, a marvelous financial learning tool for young and old alike. I am a fan of Robert Kiyosaki. I met him and his wife in a bar in Pittsburgh, PA. They are very genuine, down-to-earth, and friendly people. They are for-profit educators, and they clearly have a passion for their subject. And yes, I really believe Robert’s story about his rich dad and his poor dad. I don’t think Rich Dad is a figment of Kiyosaki’s imagination. So I am a believer. I don’t make statements like that very often. I have something to say to Mr. Kiyosaki, a disagreement I want to air with him.
Dear Mr. Kiyosaki:
If you are reading this, you already know we are kindred spirits and I admire what you do and share your commitment to financial education. In a recent article you wrote that some of your best financial advice is to not be average. That comment was the source of considerable outrage on the part of your readers, judging by their comments. Perhaps they wanted your message gift-wrapped in softer language, but I couldn’t agree with you more.
Very few people truly comprehend the mind-numbing reach and power of their government, and its insatiable appetite for their earnings and its religious zeal to dumb them down and control their lives. Therefore they do not understand how much the odds are stacked against them in their endeavor to break free from the rat race. They do not understand that to be average is to have no chance.
Why the Bank Always Wins
by johnbechtel on December 19, 2009
in Capitalism, Economics, Financial Help, Financial Independence, Mixed Economy, Politics, Socialism, Uncategorized, Wealth, money
The BIG BANKS, that is. The Big Banks always win. And Big Money. R-e-a-l-l-y BIG Money always wins. Money so big it moves around the globe swiftly and silently and at the speed of light, and you can’t even attach a name to its owners. We’re not talking about the neighbor down the street with the new Mercedes that he is so proud of. We are talking about money so big it can bring down governments, and prop up governments, dictate terms to governments. We are not talking about the millionaire next door. Nor am I talking about your lovely neighborhood bank, or even the biggest bank in your state. I am talking about the people who decide which banks fail and which ones don’t. I am talking about the people who allow some banks to fail so that THEY can buy up the failed bank’s assets with pennies on the dollar—oh, and that’s pennies on YOUR (tax) dollar, not THEIR dollar. The politicians are their pawns, who are rewarded and punished according to their compliance and cooperation. The only thing these people fear is, well, YOU. You are part of the herd, and they fear the herd. These people don’t like democracy, they don’t like the light, and they only pretend at transparency.
To read about what you can do NOW
to improve your financial literacy
and put money in your wallet
continue to the end of this article, or click here:
http://www.phoenixlogistical.com/education.html
Empires have always been about the control of the many by the few. It was said that the sun never set on the British Empire, and the most amazing feat of the British Empire is that it controlled so much of the earth’s surface with the tiniest of military garrisons and outposts scattered around the globe. In most of those places, if the local populace had risen up against them, the tiny British garrisons would easily have been overrun and sent packing. They had the greatest navy in the history of the world, but no navy could have kept them safe everywhere, and especially inland. The secret of their superiority was the quality of their information. They knew the value of information; they knew that information was power. The maintenance of power required keeping the masses in ignorance. And as long as the masses could be fed, amused, and kept poor, nothing would ever change. It was important to keep the masses poor, because that kept them too busy and too tired to interest themselves in anything other than the tyranny of survival. And the purpose of empire was to extract wealth from far flung lands and bring it home to a privileged few.
The Global Poker Playoffs: a short story about Money Supply
by johnbechtel on December 8, 2009
in Capitalism, Economics, Financial Help, Financial Independence, Politics, Wealth, money
Mayer Amschel Rothschild, the godfather of modern banking, purportedly said “Give me control of a nations money supply and I care not who makes the laws.” What did he mean by that? Is it true? Since the Federal Reserve Bank controls the money supply of the United States as the world’s largest and most influential Central Bank, does this mean that this institution is more powerful than Congress, more powerful than the Executive Branch of the government, that it operates above and beyond the control of the Republicans or Democrats? Is the Federal Reserve above the law? Was Rothschild right? What exactly is the money supply, anyway?
Why the Federal Reserve Exists
by johnbechtel on October 1, 2009
in Altruism, Capitalism, Economics, Individual Rights, Philosophy, Politics, Property Rights, U.S. Constitution, Wealth, money
Here we go with the vocabulary thing again. I promise to make this easier than your last root canal. The Federal Reserve Bank is a central bank. Central banks are created to control and manipulate the money supply. The money supply is the aggregate total of all the money in circulation in an economy. It is often referred to in the media and the industry as M. Controlling the money supply frees governments from the responsibility of living within their means. It makes it possible for them to counterfeit money. All governments have laws making counterfeiting their currency illegal. That is because all governments have a monopoly on counterfeiting and do not tolerate competition in the business.
Governments counterfeit money in the exact same way all counterfeiters do; they print it, and slip it into circulation into the economy. They spend it. They spend more money than the economy produces because they do not want to live within their means. They do not want to live within their means because they use money to buy votes. They give out goodies in return for favors; favors in the form of legislation that promotes the welfare of one group over another group; favors that line their individual pockets, reward their friends, punish their enemies, and above all, favors that get them re-elected.
Other reasons are given, of course, for the existence of the Fed. But it is axiomatic that all governments seek continual expansion of their powers, and control of the public purse and the power to tax is the Holy Grail for power seekers. The founding fathers of this country feared government more than anything, and the Constitution they framed was to protect us, not from foreigners, and not from each other, so much as from our elected government itself. The debates about economic policies are a sideshow and a distraction; the main event is the relentless expansion of executive power and the quiet transfer, not only of wealth, but of personal liberties as well. Without economic freedom based on individual rights, private property, and the right to keep and dispose of our earnings as we choose, there is no freedom at all. Read more..
Financial Literacy: Why Governments Secretly Like Inflation
by johnbechtel on August 3, 2009
in Economics, Financial Independence, Politics, Wealth, money
The dirty secret of all governments is that contrary to popular opinion, they do not hate inflation. All governmental corruption begins when they discover the power of the purse, and that they can use the public purse to perpetuate their power, privilege, and benefits. Over time all legislators and power brokers arrogate to themselves the means to stay in office and the luxuries it affords at the general taxpayer’s expense. So of course we hear how the purpose of the Federal Reserve and Congress is to maintain a strict control over inflation, that the Fed is independent of the government, and that it is immune to political influence. At best this is a Trojan horse. Inflation is the primary tool used by every government to live beyond its means, and by its “means” we mean its ability to tax. For taxation is the Achilles heel of all governments, for carried to excess it inspires armed revolution and fall from power. Governments raise taxes at their peril. Inflation, however, is a hidden tax, for it is how the government spends and borrows beyond its ability to repay. By printing money and increasing credit, thereby increasing the money supply, the government creates inflation. How does this happen?
Financial Literacy: Why Money is not Wealth
by johnbechtel on August 3, 2009
in Economics, Financial Independence, Wealth, money
I have defined money many times in articles on this blog. Money includes currency; it is a means of exchange and it represents value outside of itself. Money has no intrinsic value; its value is directly related to its general acceptance in the population. Money is a means of measuring wealth, and a store of wealth, but it is not the wealth itself. So what is wealth? Wealth is personal, material property; wealth is accumulated income, earnings, savings (stored as money); wealth is income producing assets. Wealth can be created, earned, dissipated, stored, inherited, accumulated, expropriated. Wealth is always relative; when we say a person is wealthy, we mean in comparison to others. A person on welfare in our society today often lives much, much better than the wealthiest of the so-called robber barons of 100 years ago. How do we compare a poor household of today with a large flat-screen TV, numerous digital toys, e-mail, and air conditioning and a microwave with the rich of the 19th century who did not have indoor plumbing or telephones? When we talk about eliminating poverty in today’s terms, we are using very, very relative terms.
In any context, wealth represents a responsibility and potentially a burden; wealth requires action not only to earn, but also to preserve. If a person’s wealth is greater than he is, he will lose it (or she, of course). Wealth is created by work, primarily the use of one’s mind, and by good judgment. When the mindless inherit wealth, unless there are appointed guardians of that wealth to protect them from their own foolishness, the wealth will diminish and eventually disappear. The most important type of wealth, for the financially literate, is assets that produce income. This is when your wealth is working for you. Ultimately your wealth is measured in time, not money. How long can you survive financially without working, without even getting out of bed in the morning (if you didn’t want to)? Are you one-day wealthy, one month wealthy, one year wealthy, or the rest of your life wealthy? Likewise, whenever the human mind devises a way to produce more goods and services that improve the human condition with less time and effort, wealth is created. Wealth and money are frequently confused, and those who cannot understand the difference are at a serious disadvantage in the competition for limited resources. For a short video on why money is not wealth, go to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iVebppIIFA
Money, money, money . . .
by johnbechtel on July 29, 2009
in Capitalism, Mixed Economy, Property Rights, Socialism, Wealth
All knowledge is hierarchical, which means we learn in layers, and each layer is built on what went before it. You have to learn the letters of the alphabet before you can grasp how they go together to make words, and you have to master the concept of words before you can formulate sentences. The same principle is true of economics or financial literacy. You have to master basic concepts before you can move on to more complex, higher intellectual planes. So let’s take a few baby steps here, and make sure everyone has a grasp of the fundamentals.
But before we begin, once again let’s deal with the issue of Why bother? Economics is generally considered to be the dismal science, and even the briefest mention of the subject causes the eyes of most people to glaze over in disinterest. Paradoxically, let them lack for money and they will riot in the streets, kill each other, and overthrow governments. We are so accustomed to technological progress, and we have become so certain of its inevitability that we become intellectually lazy and expect things to happen today and tomorrow as they did yesterday. We do not want to trouble our pretty little heads or interrupt our texting, youtubing, or endless chatter on social media to really learn what causes an economic chain of events. So we blithely throw around terms such as money, markets, investing, supply and demand, or wealth without any comprehension of what those terms mean.
SOMETHING FOR NOTHING
by johnbechtel on July 3, 2009
in Capitalism, Financial Help, Financial Independence, Michael Jackson, Power of Belief, Socialism, Wealth
I have decided that we humans are fundamentally lazy, that is, we travel with the herd and we will do what we have to for our own survival, but for the most part we will ride on the efforts of others as much as possible. It is best and safest to be in the middle of the herd, for those who travel on the periphery are far more likely to be picked off by predators or somehow get separated from the herd, to their destruction. Basically, all we want is what the members of any herd want, the freedom and safety to graze and reproduce. Now what, exactly, does this have to do with financial literacy? Everything, dear Reader, everything. Read more..
MICHAEL JACKSON, MONEY, AND ME
by johnbechtel on July 2, 2009
in Financial Help, Financial Independence, Michael Jackson, Self Empowerment, Wealth
(That’s not incorrect grammar in the title of this article; it’s literary license!)
Michael Jackson and his siblings grew up as Jehovah’s Witnesses, at least sort of. So did I. So I started comparing my life with his. We started at the same place, and ended up in very different places. Who did better? I decided to keep score:
Tough, authoritarian parenting was the norm. Michael, one; John, one.
Michael grew up on music; I grew up without music. My father was protecting me from people like Michael. No telling what I might do under their influence: grow my hair longer?? Michael, 1000; John, zero.















































